MIDWESTERN MARX INSTITUTE
  • Home
  • Online Articles
    • Articles >
      • All
      • News
      • Politics
      • Theory
      • Book Reviews
      • Chinese Philosophy Dialogues
    • American Socialism Travels
    • Youth League
  • Dr. Riggins' Book Series
    • Eurocommunism and the State
    • Debunking Russiagate
    • The Weather Makers
    • Essays on Bertrand Russell and Marxism
    • The Truth Behind Polls
    • Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century
    • Lenin's Materialism & Empirio-Criticism
    • Mao's Life
    • Lenin's State and Rev
    • Lenin's LWC Series
    • Anti-Dühring Series
  • Store
    • Books
    • Merchandise
  • YouTube
  • Journal of American Socialist Studies (JASS)
  • Contact
    • Article Submissions
    • The Marks of Capital
  • Online Library
  • Staff

6/20/2022

GUNS, GERMS, AND STEEL: THE  FATES OF HUMAN SOCIETIES— 25th anniversary of Jared Diamond’s now classic work in history and anthropology. A Marxist Appreciation By: Thomas Riggins

1 Comment

Read Now
 
Picture
Francis Bacon, at the beginning of the 16th Century asked, in his The New Organon, what caused the differences between Europe and less developed regions of the world, He answered that the difference “comes not from soil, not from climate, not from race, but from the arts.” Had subsequent thinkers been more attentive to Lord Bacon’s observation we might have been spared many specious arguments attempting to justify racism.

Jared Diamond’s book is still dealing with the question of these differences 500 years after they were posed (and answered) by Bacon. Diamond, a geography professor at UCLA, has spent many years in the field, in close contact with indigenous peoples, engaged in research  (studying birds) in New Guinea. He was inspired to write Guns, Germs, and Steel when one of his New Guinea contacts, Yali, asked him his own version of Bacon’s question.”Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?” The purpose of the book is thus, Diamond tells us, to answer the question “ Why did human development  proceed at  such different rates on different continents?” His answer, like Bacon's, is perfectly consistent with a historical materialist interpretation. 

Diamond informs us that “the most basic fact of world history’’ is the conquest or extermination of non-literate farming societies and societies of hunter-gatherers using stone tools by literate societies with metal tools. The treatment of Native Americans in the U.S. is an all too familiar case of a process that is still going on throughout the world. A more contemporary example is the treatment of the Amerindians in the Amazon basin of Brazil.

Our species had pretty much settled the world between 50,000 and 10,000 years ago. We should note that  “ the biggest population shift in modern times (perhaps ever!)  has been the colonization of the New World by Europeans, and the resulting conquest, numerical reduction, or complete disappearance of most groups of Native Americans,” a process continuing even today and not confined to the Americas, thanks to the the global reach of the capitalist system.  As for germs, Diamond estimates that European-Introduced diseases killed off an astounding 95 percent of the American Indian population.

And not only Native Americans. The Australian Aborigines  were almost destroyed by epidemics  introduced by the English at Sydney in 1788. Smallpox, again from the English, began the destruction of the San people (Bushmen) in 1713— and ditto for the people of Fiji, Tonga, Hawaii, and so on.

Why were native peoples more susceptible to European germs and not vice versa?

Diamond maintains that the gigantic Eurasian landmass with its east-west orientation and climatic variations provided more opportunity for early human groups to come into contact with each other, survive plagues and diseases, and eventually build up resistance to the most common germs.

Meanwhile, the north-south orientation of the Americas and Africa, along with the relative isolation of island populations in the Pacific and Australia, was not conducive to the intermingling  of vastly different human groups, as was afforded by the Eurasian landmass (including North Africa as opposed to Subsaharan Africa). The immune systems of these people had not developed adequate defenses to the germs the Europeans, whose immune systems had adapted to them over millennia of cross-cultural contact, brought with them.

This explains the European advantage vis-a-vis germs, but what about guns and steel?

Diamond points out that it was due to environmental factors that Europeans had a head start over Africans and Native Americans. It just happened that in Eurasia, especially in the Fertile Crescent, cows, sheep, goats, pigs, etc., could be domesticated. In the Americas, for example, the only domesticates were the turkey, the dog, the llama, and the guinea pig. Thus, a much lower protein yield was available, as well as the  opportunity to build up immunological defenses, since most human plagues are modifications of animal diseases  that humans came in contact with through the process of domestication. Also, Eurasia had more crops such as cereals  and with higher yields, than did Africa or the Americas.

There were only a few grain crops in Africa or the New World. West Asia, North Africa, and Europe had 33 large seeded grass species compared to 11 for the Americas and 4 for Subsaharan Africa. There is thus a material and natural basis for a greater quantity and variety of food production in the Eurasian  area. This also helped produce a greater population.

MORE FOOD, MORE IMMUNITY, AND MORE PEOPLE:

Greater food resources, a stronger immune system, and a larger population all contributed to the Eurasian head start over other areas of the world, not race. As Diamond concludes, “this very unequal distribution of wild ancestral species among the continents became an important reason why Eurasians, rather than people of other continents, were the ones to end up with guns, germs, and steel.” This is all perfectly consistent with a materialist or scientific explanation. The larger populations that arose in Eurasia stimulated cultural contacts and the growth of invention, and finally the development of science. All this has nothing to do with “race.” It is in fact a confirmation of Bacon’s position — differences between groups  of people are due to the development of the “arts.” Diamond explains how these differences came about (especially interesting are chapters such as “How  China China became Chinese” and “How Africa became Black,”)

There is in fact a Marxist approach in this book, although Diamond himself only makes one passing reference to Marx. But Diamond is in effect explaining the development of cultures and the differences between them, based  on the material conditions of production with which people found themselves confronted — availability of plants and animals for domestication as well as the size of land masses, etc. These material conditions were the basis for the development of the relations of production — the way people had to relate to each other and to nature in order to effectively exploit the resources available to them. And the two together gave rise to the various belief systems, ideologies, religions, etc., that arose around the world as humans reflected on these conditions and tried to make sense out of the world in which they found themselves.

Bill Gates was impressed by this book and is quoted in a cover blurb: “Fascinating. Lays a foundation for understanding human history “ (Hegel had already done that!). I suppose if there had been more than passing reference to Marx in the book, if the basic Marxist origins of Diamond’s type of historical analysis had been pointed out, developed and even credited (especially the chapter “From Egalitarianism to Kleptocracy”) Mr. Gates would not have been so fascinated.

There is at least one important caveat worth noting. Diamond, in order to demonstrate his solidarity with the people of New Guinea, maintains the belief they are “smarter” than Europeans. This is due to their living in a complicated undemanding environment, as a result of which they developed “superior intelligence” as opposed to the likely “genetic disadvantage” of Europeans. While it is refreshing to have Europeans targeted as “genetically disadvantaged” for a change, this really won’t do (just reverse  the argument to see what I mean). Once you start giving a scientific veneer to labeling any  group of humans as genetically superior vis-a-vis intelligence— the floodgates of racism are opened. In this respect, Francis Bacon, a philosophical pioneer of the Age of Reason, was truer to the cause of science than our UCLA professor.  

Author

​Thomas Riggins is a retired philosophy teacher (NYU, The New School of Social Research, among others) who received a PhD from the CUNY Graduate Center (1983). He has been active in the civil rights and peace movements since the 1960s when he was chairman of the Young People's Socialist League at Florida State University and also worked for CORE in voter registration in north Florida (Leon County). He has written for many online publications such as People's World and Political Affairs where he was an associate editor. He also served on the board of the Bertrand Russell Society and was president of the Corliss Lamont chapter in New York City of the American Humanist Association. He is the author of Reading the Classical Texts of Marxism.


Archives

June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020

Share

1 Comment
Charles Brown
6/20/2022 04:28:32 pm

Well said !
Including thir genocidal usurpation of the Western Hemisphere.

Gunpowder was invented in China , but an Emperor forbade its use in ear . Europeans , in their Greco-Roman tradition used it to conquer the globe . _Historical_ materialism.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Details

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020

    Categories

    All
    Aesthetics
    Afghanistan
    Althusser
    American Civil War
    American Socialism
    American Socialism Travels
    Anti Imperialism
    Anti-Imperialism
    Art
    August Willich
    Berlin Wall
    Bolivia
    Book Review
    Brazil
    Capitalism
    Censorship
    Chile
    China
    Chinese Philosophy Dialogue
    Christianity
    CIA
    Class
    Climate Change
    COINTELPRO
    Communism
    Confucius
    Cuba
    Debunking Russiagate
    Democracy
    Democrats
    DPRK
    Eco Socialism
    Ecuador
    Egypt
    Elections
    Engels
    Eurocommunism
    Feminism
    Frederick Douglass
    Germany
    Ghandi
    Global Capitalism
    Gramsci
    History
    Hunger
    Immigration
    Imperialism
    Incarceration
    Interview
    Joe Biden
    Labor
    Labour
    Lenin
    Liberalism
    Lincoln
    Linke
    Literature
    Lula Da Silva
    Malcolm X
    Mao
    Marx
    Marxism
    May Day
    Media
    Medicare For All
    Mencius
    Militarism
    MKULTRA
    Mozi
    National Affairs
    Nelson Mandela
    Neoliberalism
    New Left
    News
    Nina Turner
    Novel
    Palestine
    Pandemic
    Paris Commune
    Pentagon
    Peru Libre
    Phillip-bonosky
    Philosophy
    Political-economy
    Politics
    Pol Pot
    Proletarian
    Putin
    Race
    Religion
    Russia
    Settlercolonialism
    Slavery
    Slavoj-zizek
    Slavoj-zizek
    Social-democracy
    Socialism
    South-africa
    Soviet-union
    Summer-2020-protests
    Syria
    Theory
    The-weather-makers
    Trump
    Venezuela
    War-on-drugs
    Whatistobedone...now...likenow-now
    Wilfrid-sellers
    Worker-cooperatives
    Xunzi

All ORIGINAL Midwestern Marx content is under Creative Commons
(CC BY-ND 4.0) which means you can republish our work only if it is attributed properly (link the original publication to the republication) and not modified. 
Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos from U.S. Secretary of Defense, ben.kaden
  • Home
  • Online Articles
    • Articles >
      • All
      • News
      • Politics
      • Theory
      • Book Reviews
      • Chinese Philosophy Dialogues
    • American Socialism Travels
    • Youth League
  • Dr. Riggins' Book Series
    • Eurocommunism and the State
    • Debunking Russiagate
    • The Weather Makers
    • Essays on Bertrand Russell and Marxism
    • The Truth Behind Polls
    • Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century
    • Lenin's Materialism & Empirio-Criticism
    • Mao's Life
    • Lenin's State and Rev
    • Lenin's LWC Series
    • Anti-Dühring Series
  • Store
    • Books
    • Merchandise
  • YouTube
  • Journal of American Socialist Studies (JASS)
  • Contact
    • Article Submissions
    • The Marks of Capital
  • Online Library
  • Staff