MIDWESTERN MARX INSTITUTE
  • Home
  • Online Articles
    • Articles >
      • All
      • News
      • Politics
      • Theory
      • Book Reviews
      • Chinese Philosophy Dialogues
    • American Socialism Travels
    • Youth League
  • Dr. Riggins' Book Series
    • Eurocommunism and the State
    • Debunking Russiagate
    • The Weather Makers
    • Essays on Bertrand Russell and Marxism
    • The Truth Behind Polls
    • Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century
    • Lenin's Materialism & Empirio-Criticism
    • Mao's Life
    • Lenin's State and Rev
    • Lenin's LWC Series
    • Anti-Dühring Series
  • Store
    • Books
    • Merchandise
  • YouTube
  • Journal of American Socialist Studies (JASS)
  • Contact
    • Article Submissions
    • The Marks of Capital
  • Online Library
  • Staff

1/20/2024

COMMUNISTS AND AN OPEN BALLOT By: Max R

1 Comment

Read Now
 
Picture
The recent political events of state courts in Colorado and Maine barring Donald Trump from running in the 2024 election should be of intense interest to Communists in the USA. While center-left “progressives” and those who tail the Democrats applaud this decision by the state courts, this is not a beneficial development for anti-imperialists or for all Americans who value our civil liberties. In the United States since the period of McCarthyism and the Cold War, the civil liberties of the American people have been on a precipitous decline. From the Smith Act, the construction of an anti-communist deep state through the FBI, the Patriot Act, and other transgressions on the liberty of the American working class, bourgeois democracy is waning in the United States. 

Since its revolutionary beginning, our country has always been a limited bourgeois democracy, even though the revolution represented the first of its kind. From American chattel slavery to the limitations on voting, to the Electoral College, the Supreme Court’s power post-Marbury vs Madison, and the existence of a bi-cameral legislative branch, these institutions were intentionally constructed by the land-owning and wealthy in the new Republic to restrict the power of the American yeoman farmer, smallholder, petty bourgeoise, and the nascent American proletariat--in sum, the majoritarian power of the working class. Throughout the 19th century to the present day, the American people have constantly waged a revolutionary struggle to expand upon bourgeois democratic rights and the power of the working class. 

From the struggle for universal suffrage without the precondition of property, to the abolitionist movement, the revolutionary uprisings such as Nat Turner's slave rebellion, Harpers Ferry, Bleeding Kansas, the Civil War against the reactionary Confederacy, the land reform and revolution of reconstruction, to the labor movement, socialist movement, the anti-fascist war of 1941-1945 and the Civil Rights Movement. The American people have a revolutionary tradition to be proud of which will form the basis for future progressive aspirations of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness via a people's government and working-class power. With this context, it is important for Communists in America, to recognize and actively struggle against the regressing political situation in the United States. ​
Picture
It is a basic democratic right that all Americans of a certain age and meeting citizenship requirements may run for elected office. But this basic freedom is presently under attack, as it was in the past. In the 1860 Election, Lincoln was arbitrarily and unconstitutionally barred from the ballot in almost the entire South. This was due to Lincoln’s refusal to countenance the cannibalistic expansion of American slavery, for this, the 1860 election was thoroughly rigged against the progressive Lincoln. Despite, this Lincoln was victorious in 1860 and would manage to lead the United States and a grand anti-slavery coalition in the turbulent years of the American Civil War.  

Another example of this utter lack of regard for upholding even the appearance of bourgeois democracy was when southern states barred Communist Party leader William Z. Foster from ballots during his 1932 presidential run. The American Communist Party was the only political party at this time with a thoroughly anti-racist, anti-Jim Crow platform. For this, southern states barred him from the ballot, fearing an outpour of support for William Z. Foster and an open opponent of Jim Crow. William Z. Foster suffered horrific treatment during this campaign, being arrested at every train stop, enduring torture by local police and interrogation, and eventually having a nervous breakdown. ​
Picture
Entering 2024, the attempts of multiple states to obstruct Donald Trump from the ballot is not only wrong but is a dangerous precedent, despite the present glee on the so-called “left.” Firstly, Trump was never charged, let alone convicted, of insurrection, and therefore under the 14th Amendment, as an American citizen he is allowed to run for office. Whatever mainstream liberal media might proclaim, the January 6th riot cannot plausibly be described as a coup or insurrection. These require the support of armed forces the military, bloodshed, and a serious threat to the existing power of the state. None of these were present on January 6th, 2020. The real power in the United States does not lay in Congress, but rather in the Hamptons, the Pentagon, the FBI headquarters in DC, and CIA headquarters in Langley. We Communists understand that the state and its armed forces are the real power, not constitutional bodies. 

There was no serious threat to the American government that day, but rather an immense embarrassment which has weakened the American Empire. There is evidence of FBI and Capitol police complicity in the riot, but this was not enough to seize state power or change the underlying power of US politics. Communists must be wary of the hysteria generated by liberals and neocons alike over this event, as this scare has been used to pass new laws, create a new police force, and further weaken the civil liberties of the American people and our access to the supposed “people's house.” Communists do not and should not care whether right-wingers farted in Nancy Pelosi’s chair or mocked the symbol of US imperialism, war, and destruction abroad. 

Just as Donald Trump is being banned from state ballots, as demonstrated by history, true progressives and Communists have repeatedly been subjected to the same tactics. For too long in US politics, many ostensive American Communists have simply tailed the Democratic Party. During the Cold War, lending our support may have been the correct position, given the dangers of escalation and the warmongering anti-communism of Republicans. However, the Democratic Party of the 1970s and early 80s is NOT the Democratic Party of today. In recent decades, the Democrats have moved fully to the right on foreign policy and economics. The party has emerged as the more effective evil and purveyor of US imperialism. Communists must therefore hold an political line independent of the two bourgeois parties, maneuvering to attract disaffected, populist, working-class members, and eventual voters. American Communists do not benefit from the removal of any candidate from the ballot, as this maneuver would not end with Trump. If this dangerous precedent is set, the ruling class would have a new weapon with which to remove any and all anti-establishment electoral candidates.

Author

​Max R


This article was produced by The Revolution Report.

Archives

January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020

Share

1 Comment
steven t johnson
2/7/2024 11:40:42 am

I have been very favorably impressed with this website. But I am driven to comment here, despite my overall whole-hearted approval, and appreciation of some of your literature I have purchased.

"Firstly, Trump was never charged, let alone convicted, of insurrection, and therefore under the 14th Amendment, as an American citizen he is allowed to run for office." The proper response to this is, the nonfeasance of US legal authorities does not acquit Trump and the others. Non-prosecution is a political choice and the refusal to prosecute Trump does not take away the right of other US citizens (or even officials) to object to exempting the powerful from the law, whether from fear or sympathy.

"Whatever mainstream liberal media might proclaim, the January 6th riot cannot plausibly be described as a coup or insurrection. These require the support of armed forces the military, bloodshed, and a serious threat to the existing power of the state. None of these were present on January 6th, 2020."

A coup does not require bloodshed, it requires the illegal use of force. The may be violence resulting in bloodshed, but also the threat of violence and even the fear of violence. Those were most certainly present.

But I do agree that a coup requires the support of...well, not *all* of the "armed forces the military." Given that the military has responsibility for the defense of the District of Columbia, it was the refusal of elements of the military to stand down that was that military support that signified .1/6 was a coup, not a mere civil disturbance.

If the street insurrection had succeeded in breaking up the certification vote, those same generals (look up the roles of Pyatt and Flynn, brother of the notorious Michael Flynn, for a start,) would have objected to Trump's declaration he was still president and refused to come out to "restore order?" Perhaps but this is a dubious hypothesis indeed. There is no indication that the coup plans were solely to interfere with the certification vote!

The objection that to be a coup it has to be "serious" is I'm sorry a weaseling out of the issue. The reported plot by some right-wing millionaires to use Smedley Butler to remove Franklin Roosevelt may not have been "serious" but it was still treasonous. Any friend to Trump can approve this usefully vague standard, which serves as a way to move the goalposts.

"The real power in the United States does not lay in Congress, but rather in the Hamptons, the Pentagon, the FBI headquarters in DC, and CIA headquarters in Langley. We Communists understand that the state and its armed forces are the real power, not constitutional bodies." Well, state power is not in the Hamptons, nor are bodies of armed men. Congress is one of the mechanisms by which the ruling class controls the FBI and the CIA. And this objection if taken too literally says that the White House, a mere elective office, is not the real power! Those members of Congress who supported the coup have escaped unscathed, but they should have been charged too. And the same goes too for people like Acting Secretary of Defense Mark Esper. He had no uniform but is he not part of the armed forces too?

But taking the role of the military very seriously, in the event, as I understand it, VIce-President Pence, personally terrorized and politically unnerved, broke the chain of command to order the military to do their duty---finally---and restore order, as was always their responsibility in DC.

Mainstream liberal media minimizes the coup for political reasons, falsely pretending that it was all just a handful of rioters. It studiously refuses to take the coup seriously pretending it was essentially a tantrum of Trump, an easily soluble problem of a Bad Person, not a failing system.

By the way, the mainstream media is not uniformly "liberal" but much of it, perhaps the major part these days, is conservative. Their view is that there was no coup at all, that Trump was never charged with insurrection, much less convicted and trying to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment is mere political prosecution and itself a threat to democracy! That in fact, the BLM protest movement was just as much, if not more so, a lawless, anti-democratic movement as the patriots of 1/6, who are now political prisoners!

Until we have a better replacement, I am rather in favor of following the forms and ideals of even bourgeois democracy. The birthright citizenship provision of the Fourteenth Amendment, the equal protection of the laws provisioin, the provision for reduced representation by states that remove the franchise from part of their citizens (guess which part?) are all threatened, if not already eviscerated by right-wing lawyers perverting justice under the color of law. Why should we fight against the third section?

My personal belief is also those same right-wing judges will falsify the Constitution yet again and agree that Trump is elegible to run.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Details

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020

    Categories

    All
    Aesthetics
    Afghanistan
    Althusser
    American Civil War
    American Socialism
    American Socialism Travels
    Anti Imperialism
    Anti-Imperialism
    Art
    August Willich
    Berlin Wall
    Bolivia
    Book Review
    Brazil
    Capitalism
    Censorship
    Chile
    China
    Chinese Philosophy Dialogue
    Christianity
    CIA
    Class
    Climate Change
    COINTELPRO
    Communism
    Confucius
    Cuba
    Debunking Russiagate
    Democracy
    Democrats
    DPRK
    Eco Socialism
    Ecuador
    Egypt
    Elections
    Engels
    Eurocommunism
    Feminism
    Frederick Douglass
    Germany
    Ghandi
    Global Capitalism
    Gramsci
    History
    Hunger
    Immigration
    Imperialism
    Incarceration
    Interview
    Joe Biden
    Labor
    Labour
    Lenin
    Liberalism
    Lincoln
    Linke
    Literature
    Lula Da Silva
    Malcolm X
    Mao
    Marx
    Marxism
    May Day
    Media
    Medicare For All
    Mencius
    Militarism
    MKULTRA
    Mozi
    National Affairs
    Nelson Mandela
    Neoliberalism
    New Left
    News
    Nina Turner
    Novel
    Palestine
    Pandemic
    Paris Commune
    Pentagon
    Peru Libre
    Phillip-bonosky
    Philosophy
    Political-economy
    Politics
    Pol Pot
    Proletarian
    Putin
    Race
    Religion
    Russia
    Settlercolonialism
    Slavery
    Slavoj-zizek
    Slavoj-zizek
    Social-democracy
    Socialism
    South-africa
    Soviet-union
    Summer-2020-protests
    Syria
    Theory
    The-weather-makers
    Trump
    Venezuela
    War-on-drugs
    Whatistobedone...now...likenow-now
    Wilfrid-sellers
    Worker-cooperatives
    Xunzi

All ORIGINAL Midwestern Marx content is under Creative Commons
(CC BY-ND 4.0) which means you can republish our work only if it is attributed properly (link the original publication to the republication) and not modified. 
Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos from U.S. Secretary of Defense, ben.kaden
  • Home
  • Online Articles
    • Articles >
      • All
      • News
      • Politics
      • Theory
      • Book Reviews
      • Chinese Philosophy Dialogues
    • American Socialism Travels
    • Youth League
  • Dr. Riggins' Book Series
    • Eurocommunism and the State
    • Debunking Russiagate
    • The Weather Makers
    • Essays on Bertrand Russell and Marxism
    • The Truth Behind Polls
    • Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century
    • Lenin's Materialism & Empirio-Criticism
    • Mao's Life
    • Lenin's State and Rev
    • Lenin's LWC Series
    • Anti-Dühring Series
  • Store
    • Books
    • Merchandise
  • YouTube
  • Journal of American Socialist Studies (JASS)
  • Contact
    • Article Submissions
    • The Marks of Capital
  • Online Library
  • Staff