MIDWESTERN MARX INSTITUTE
  • Home
  • Online Articles
    • Articles >
      • All
      • News
      • Politics
      • Theory
      • Book Reviews
      • Chinese Philosophy Dialogues
    • American Socialism Travels
    • Youth League
  • Dr. Riggins' Book Series
    • Eurocommunism and the State
    • Debunking Russiagate
    • The Weather Makers
    • Essays on Bertrand Russell and Marxism
    • The Truth Behind Polls
    • Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century
    • Lenin's Materialism & Empirio-Criticism
    • Mao's Life
    • Lenin's State and Rev
    • Lenin's LWC Series
    • Anti-Dühring Series
  • Store
    • Books
    • Merchandise
  • YouTube
  • Journal of American Socialist Studies (JASS)
  • Contact
    • Article Submissions
    • The Marks of Capital
  • Online Library
  • Staff

9/16/2025

An Interview With A Member of the KPRF By: Nicholas Reed

1 Comment

Read Now
 
Picture
Greetings, please tell us about yourself!
 
My name is Peter Alekseevich Kovalsky, I graduated from the Moscow Aviation Institute.
I’m a party Secretary for the Lyublino Branch of the KPRF, Moscow City Branch. I have been a member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) since 2017. I do not consider myself left, but I consider myself red.
 
An interesting distinction! What is your political orientation, and could you tell us in more detail about the experience and events that influenced the formation of your current political views and worldview in modern Russia?
 
My political orientation is Marxism-Leninism, or, as we like to joke, orthodox Stalinism. My views were undoubtedly formed in the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. When I joined it back in 2017, I was not a communist - rather a spontaneous leftist. Having become a member of the party, I began to get to know the teachings of Marxism-Leninism, other ideologies, as well as the various parties and movements of the modern Russian Federation. And, of course, I was significantly influenced by our Russian existence itself. After all, it is precisely this, as we know, that determines consciousness.
 
How do you evaluate the Soviet period of history, and how does its legacy influence your views on the past and present of Russia?
 
The Soviet period is hugely important, although it did not last that long by historical standards. If we take the history of the USSR before Gorbachev came to power, then in general I evaluate it extremely positively. I like the 1930s the most, and the era of recovery after the Great Patriotic War. In the 30s, people had great enthusiasm and creative impulse. This was the time of great construction projects of communism and faith in a bright future. And there was an absolutely correct policy of the party: an alliance of communists and non-party members. I have no doubt that, if not for the war, communism would have been built in a single country. The grandiose battle with fascism that conquered all of Europe physically knocked out of the ranks of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) most of the most ardent communists and Komsomol members, because they were the first to go on the attack.
Picture
Peter Kovalsky with Jackson Hinkle, Christopher Helali, Nicholas Reed
​The catchphrase that circulated among non-party fighters during the Great Patriotic War is also famous in Russia: "If I die, consider me a communist." The post-war years were no less stormy and full of bright achievements: the restoration of the country, large-scale stances, new challenges. It is especially important to pay attention to Stalin's plan for the transformation of nature. This plan included combating desertification, forest shelterbelts around agricultural fields and arable lands, and the creation of new rivers and lakes. It was the implementation of this plan, although not complete, that allowed the USSR to be reliably protected from the threat of crop failure and famine, similar to those the country faced in the 1930s and in 1946.
 
Now China is implementing a similar plan in the Gobi Desert, and in the 2000s, Muammar Gaddafi tried to implement it in the Libyan Jamahiriya. Of course, it is also worth noting the conquest of space. This was a grandiose achievement, to which my family has a direct relation. My great-grandfather was one of those who led the USSR's space launch program until 1976, and my grandfather designed and assembled life support systems for astronauts. The era of space exploration was also a special period. New horizons were opening up for humanity. People dreamed, believed and worked fruitfully.
The Soviet Union was once again seized by a special creative impulse. The spirit of that era is well reflected in the song: "And on Mars apple trees will bloom". The great achievements of the USSR inspire us, modern Russian communists, to new achievements. It is necessary to use all the experience accumulated in the Soviet years in the modern Russian Federation. And on its basis to create a new and beautiful Soviet Socialist Russia of the future!
 
How did the turbulent and chaotic 1990s in Russia influence your personal experience, upbringing, and worldview? How did this period affect you or your family, their life circumstances, values, or prospects?
 
I was born in 1996 and was too young to talk about the full experience of the 90s. All I can do is study it from a historical point of view, learn information from the stories of older comrades. However, my relatives do not talk much about that era. One way or another, what I know is enough to understand: it was a monstrous catastrophe, arranged not without the help of the West, which had a heavy impact on all former citizens of the USSR and their descendants. Rampant crime, hyperinflation, delayed wages, the war in Chechnya, the lack of basic goods and even food in stores. They survived only thanks to the dachas that the Soviet government once generously handed out to the population. The collapse of the USSR was a terrible disaster for the entire country. I think that in many ways this happened because of servility towards the West. The older generation had and partly still has a special piety towards Western culture, life, and everyday life. Internal and external enemies of socialism took advantage of this, and the Soviet Union fell. Most modern Russian youth do not have such idolatry.
 
Do socialism and Marxism occupy an important place in shaping the future of Russia and how do you imagine their role in the political and social life of the country?
 
Yes, they do. In the 34 years that have passed since the disappearance of the USSR, the world has become a much more unstable and dangerous place. Terrorism, wars, the absolute inability of individual heads of state to negotiate on issues of global security. It has simply become very scary to live. You don't know what awaits you tonight. The USSR was the guardian of peace and stability on our planet floating in outer space. Fidel Castro's slogan: "Socialism or death!" is more relevant than ever. Either humanity will build communism, or perish from capitalism and imperialism.
 
For Russia, there is no other choice but socialism. Rosa Luxemburg's phrase "Socialism or barbarism" has become a fulfilled forecast for our Motherland. Degradation is occurring in almost all spheres of life: education, medicine, housing and communal services, industry. Even in those industries that we used to be especially proud of, for example, space exploration. If my memory serves me right, until 2020, the USSR and Russia held the record as the country that launched the largest number of satellites and automatic ground stations to Mars. Now this record has been broken by the United States. In the Soviet years, we launched stations that landed successfully and transmitted a panorama of the surface of Venus. Now it seems like something fantastic. Unfortunately, there is no point in even talking about the Moon program. Of course, there are exceptions. In modern Russia, the nuclear industry is still developed, and agriculture is progressing.
 
However, we will be able to achieve truly great heights and return to the vanguard of world progress only by radically rebuilding the existing system of social relations. In order to correct all the mistakes and shortcomings of both the USSR and modern Russia, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation must come to power.
 
To what extent do the current generation of Russian youth share your ideological views and how do their views reflect your views or differ from them?
 
This is a very difficult question. Young people are disoriented and disorganized. Most of them are not interested in politics in principle. Everyone is primarily concerned with work, career, relationships, the pace of life is very high, especially in mega cities. Young people simply do not have time to think about their political preferences. This is even more understandable given the huge number of dummies and simulacra. People do not want to be deceived, and deep immersion in political issues takes a lot of time and effort. Those who are still interested in politics can be driven crazy by the variety of different parties, movements and groups. As I mentioned earlier, there are a great many Marxist circles in the country alone. Officially, there are as many as 28 parties in Russia whose names contain the word "communist" or "communism"! The Communist Party of the Russian Federation has a youth organization - the Leninist Young Communist League of the Russian Federation (LKSM RF). You can join it from the age of 14. Currently, there are about 70 thousand people there. On an all-Russian scale, this is, of course, not enough. But even within the LKSM, views on politics differ. There are different ideological currents: Stalinists, Trotskyists, Bukharinists, Zinovievists, Maoists, Jucheists and others... Not all of them are close to my personal ideological preferences. But I have to work with these people too.
 
Of course, there is an important problem of why young people do not participate in politics, and not only young people, but also older people. Political parties and movements do not have a vision of the future that these young people will follow. As soon as a more or less clear vision of the future appears, then progressive humanity will follow it.
Picture
Peter Kovalsky with Nicholas Reed, Christopher Helali, Viktor Tsarikhin, Ivan Udaltsov
​What specific actions or initiatives are you taking to promote your ideological ideals within the Russian social and political landscape?
 
The party activists are constantly working - it's simply impossible to remember everything here. And it would be wrong to overemphasize my own merits. I'll try to list the most important ones.
 
For example, I wrote bills: to study the experience of waste recycling in Western countries and the USSR and the possibility of using this experience now. I wrote a bill against private sobriety centers, which they even wanted to adopt, but in the end they cancelled. I also proposed amendments to the constitution, and 9 out of 10 of my proposals were included in the final program of the KPRF to change it. I also actively participate in the party's election campaigns as an agitator and observer at elections. I regularly attend meetings with the Communist Party of the Russian Federation deputies and round tables organized by the Communist Party of the Russian Federation faction in the State Duma and the Moscow City Duma on numerous topical issues. I participate in rallies and mass street actions.
The action "Two Carnations for Comrade Stalin" is also worth mentioning. It takes place twice a year: on December 21, the birthday of Joseph Vissarionovich, and on March 5, the day of his death.
 
An informal initiative group, which includes a variety of people, including even Stalin's great-grandson Yakov Dzhugashvili, collects funds and purchases bouquets of flowers to lay on the grave of the late Leader of the Peoples. Money for carnations is sent by a variety of people from all over Russia and the globe. On Stalin's 140th birthday, 14,000 red carnations were laid on his grave...
 
I take part in meetings of the Zinoviev Club (the club of philosopher Alexander Alexandrovich Zinoviev), in the Efremov Readings (science fiction writer Ivan Antonovich Efremov). I regularly visit the Palestinian embassy and express my support for the long-suffering Palestinian people in their fight against Israeli aggression. I take an active part in the formation of convoys with humanitarian aid sent by the Communist Party of the Russian Federation to help Donbass. I believe that this is very important work. I began participating in it in 2018, that is, even before the SVO, and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation as a whole began sending humanitarian aid to residents of the DPR and LPR in 2014.
 
I also take an active part in the Union of Organic Farming, where we discuss important agricultural issues, initiatives, and bills. My comrades and I do not forget about cultural life and education. I regularly go to art exhibitions, museums, and galleries, and visit book fairs. The people at all these events are completely different, with different political views. In conversations, discussions, and even at feasts, there is lively, direct agitation for communism and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.
 
How do you assess the role of patriotism in the formation of the national identity of modern Russia, and what influenced your understanding of this?
 
First, you need to understand what patriotism is. In its classical meaning, it is love for the Motherland, pride in its achievements, culture, and science. Patriotism is often understood as love for the state and for the authorities. You cannot question any decisions of the authorities - you just need to accept them without complaint. And rejoice. This "patriotism" is unacceptable to me. We must love not those in power, but our people. Improve their well-being, increase their wealth, especially cultural. In Russia, there is even such a popular expression: "I love my homeland very much, but I hate the state." The homeland is your people. In this sense, as the famous song sang, our homeland is the Revolution, and we are loyal to it alone.
 
How do you think the legacy of the Soviet Union inspires or guides the aspirations of modern Russian youth?
 
Young people in Russia are different. Most people have no time to think about such things - as I have already noted, they simply do not have time for reflection. Their life is a constant squirrel spinning in a wheel: study, work, family, credit, mortgage. The topic of the Soviet past interests politicized youth: those who are interested in history, or are somehow connected with science. But this youth can also be divided into many groups. For some people who are fascinated by past eras, the Soviet era is not so interesting - they prefer another time, or even a country. Unfortunately, there are those who condemn and hate the USSR.
 
If we take left-oriented youth, the Soviet Union inspires them in different ways, depending on the field of activity. For example, there is an artistic environment - they are interested in examples of heroes of socialist realism, who amaze with their dedication and devotion to the goal. What high ideals were invested in Soviet cinema, music and even cartoons! They glorified and brought up the best qualities of people. Those who are somehow connected with politics and dream of a different, better future are inspired by the USSR as a real example of the possibility of building a just society.
Patriots-"statists" are inspired by the power of the Soviet Union, how our country fought for world leadership and was among the first states in many different spheres
 
Those who are engaged in science remember the famous Soviet scientists - pioneers and discoverers, who radically advanced science in their fields, received well-deserved wide recognition throughout the world. For me, among other things, the USSR is confidence in the future. Faith in a bright future, the richest cultural component. This is true stability and reliability in everything. Conviction: whatever task we undertake as a state and society, it will certainly be within our power.
Picture
Peter Kovalsky at the 132nd KPRF-Humanitarian Aid Convoy-in collaboration with ACP
Do you think that the revival of Soviet-style values ​​among Russian youth is a response to Western influence, and if so, in what way?
 
Young people are atomized now - and society as a whole is too. The spread of socialist values ​​(collectivism, patriotism, selfless mutual assistance, etc.) would be useful for the recovery of Russian society, which is currently being forced into a cult of consumption. Naturally, reliance on the Soviet ideological heritage should be carried out taking into account new realities: the strongest influence of the information and media sphere on minds, growing inequality, the "zombification" of society with the help of technologies for manipulating mass consciousness, and a decline in the level of education. We have lost a lot in the quality of human capital in the 90s and 00s. Unfortunately, this cannot be changed overnight.
 
Undoubtedly, it would be very good if tomorrow the broad masses came to the Soviet, socialist worldview. Of course, those who are involved in the discourse of the KPRF and left-patriotic forces, of course, have a set of values ​​close to the previous Soviet models.
 
What role do you think educational and cultural institutions play in shaping the Soviet or patriotic identity of young Russians, and how have these institutions influenced your own beliefs? Also, has education changed in Russia during the Yeltsin and Putin eras?
 
Education certainly plays a big role. For example, when I was in school and college, patriotic education was not yet mainstream and was not given the attention it deserved. Now there is an attempt to instill patriotism in the younger generation.
 
From my school years, I remember how we were enthusiastically told about the individualistic approach to life and the primacy of the individual. We carefully studied the works of Solzhenitsyn, and wild anti-communism was developed in us. If it was the eve of May 9 - a sacred holiday for our people, then there were always stories about how terrible the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Great Patriotic War was. Stalin was called so many things! He was a tyrant, an incompetent leader, and a sadistic murderer, and they say we won the Great Patriotic War not thanks to, but in spite of his leadership. Now the approach has changed. Of course, in the mouths of the officialdom, Stalin is still a tyrant, but they also acknowledge his positive sides. It is not for nothing that this year alone many monuments to Joseph Vissarionovich were unveiled. Particularly unexpected was the unveiling of the bas-relief on Taganskaya "Gratitude of the People to the Victorious Leader".
 
Understanding how popular he is among the people, the ruling class is trying to "privatize" and legally replace the true image of Stalin in the mass consciousness. The systemic media say that Joseph Vissarionovich was not a communist at all, not a successor to Lenin, but a red monarch who shot the entire so-called "Leninist guard" and pursued a nationalist policy. They are building an artificial illusion of some kind of "Stalinism without socialism" at great speed. But this is impossible! And most of the propaganda tricks of those in power are refuted by elementary logic. Similar features are observed in other aspects of historical politics. The people are told about the imaginary greatness of the Russian Empire under Nicholas II. They assure us that we were the first in everything, and if not for the revolution, we would almost rule the world.
 
Speaking about education in general, it is only getting worse from year to year.
Soviet personnel are leaving, and they are being replaced by young people who are overwhelmed with unnecessary bureaucracy, reports, and manuals. Teachers are paid a low salary. There is no respect for the profession from either parents or students. Students do not strive for knowledge, and teachers do not want to instill this knowledge in students. The system needs to be changed, and there's a party that can do it - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

Author
​

Nicholas Reed

Archives

September 2025
August 2025
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020

Share

1 Comment
Siden04
9/17/2025 08:12:18 pm


'The system needs to be changed, and there's a party that can do it - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.'

‘Mr Lobanov says the KPRF [Communist Party of the Russian Federation] has been trapped by Kremlin design into a predetermined place within the existing system and, unless it moves more decisively into the streets to stage more convincing forms of peaceful resistance – as happened when millions of Russians protested against election fraud a decade ago – it will lose relevance with Russian voters. In fact, within the KPRF some members have lamented a too-passive reaction by leader Gennady Zyuganov to the results, and are pushing against their leaders’ “business as usual” relations with authorities’ (Yahoo, 26 October, 2021). Zyuganov, KPRF leader since 1993, said in a radio interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda tabloid, that ‘the main slogan of communism – “He who does not work shall not eat” – is written in the Apostle Paul’s Second Epistle to the Thessalonians found in the New Testament. “We need to study the Bible,” Zyuganov concluded’ (Moscow Times, 2 September, 2021).

‘He who does not work shall not eat.’ Compare this biblically-inspired Leninist distortion with the real thing: ‘From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs’ (Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha programme, 1875). Also, the vanguardist Lenin again: ‘If socialism can only be realised when the intellectual development of all the people permits it, then we shall not see socialism for at least five hundred years’ (from a speech in November 1918 quoted by John Reed in Ten Days that Shook the World), compared with early socialist Flora Tristan: ‘the emancipation of the working class must be achieved by the working class itself’.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Details

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020

    Categories

    All
    Aesthetics
    Afghanistan
    Althusser
    American Civil War
    American Socialism
    American Socialism Travels
    Anti Imperialism
    Anti-Imperialism
    Art
    August Willich
    Berlin Wall
    Bolivia
    Book Review
    Brazil
    Capitalism
    Censorship
    Chile
    China
    Chinese Philosophy Dialogue
    Christianity
    CIA
    Class
    Climate Change
    COINTELPRO
    Communism
    Confucius
    Cuba
    Debunking Russiagate
    Democracy
    Democrats
    DPRK
    Eco Socialism
    Ecuador
    Egypt
    Elections
    Engels
    Eurocommunism
    Feminism
    Frederick Douglass
    Germany
    Ghandi
    Global Capitalism
    Gramsci
    History
    Hunger
    Immigration
    Imperialism
    Incarceration
    Interview
    Joe Biden
    Labor
    Labour
    Lenin
    Liberalism
    Lincoln
    Linke
    Literature
    Lula Da Silva
    Malcolm X
    Mao
    Marx
    Marxism
    May Day
    Media
    Medicare For All
    Mencius
    Militarism
    MKULTRA
    Mozi
    National Affairs
    Nelson Mandela
    Neoliberalism
    New Left
    News
    Nina Turner
    Novel
    Palestine
    Pandemic
    Paris Commune
    Pentagon
    Peru Libre
    Phillip-bonosky
    Philosophy
    Political-economy
    Politics
    Pol Pot
    Proletarian
    Putin
    Race
    Religion
    Russia
    Settlercolonialism
    Slavery
    Slavoj-zizek
    Slavoj-zizek
    Social-democracy
    Socialism
    South-africa
    Soviet-union
    Summer-2020-protests
    Syria
    Theory
    The-weather-makers
    Trump
    Venezuela
    War-on-drugs
    Whatistobedone...now...likenow-now
    Wilfrid-sellers
    Worker-cooperatives
    Xunzi

All ORIGINAL Midwestern Marx content is under Creative Commons
(CC BY-ND 4.0) which means you can republish our work only if it is attributed properly (link the original publication to the republication) and not modified. 
Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos from U.S. Secretary of Defense, ben.kaden
  • Home
  • Online Articles
    • Articles >
      • All
      • News
      • Politics
      • Theory
      • Book Reviews
      • Chinese Philosophy Dialogues
    • American Socialism Travels
    • Youth League
  • Dr. Riggins' Book Series
    • Eurocommunism and the State
    • Debunking Russiagate
    • The Weather Makers
    • Essays on Bertrand Russell and Marxism
    • The Truth Behind Polls
    • Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century
    • Lenin's Materialism & Empirio-Criticism
    • Mao's Life
    • Lenin's State and Rev
    • Lenin's LWC Series
    • Anti-Dühring Series
  • Store
    • Books
    • Merchandise
  • YouTube
  • Journal of American Socialist Studies (JASS)
  • Contact
    • Article Submissions
    • The Marks of Capital
  • Online Library
  • Staff